One less super power to beat. Who’s next?
Real madrid has been bailed out before. From a political perspective saving Barcelona could improve the image of Spain within the Catalan region. La Liga as product is far weaker if Barcelona are not challengingThey’ve “set a budget” of €766m, which I assume means revenue (including player sales because their top line turnover has never been anywhere near that figure before). They’ve obviously slashed the wages but nobody is turning up to watch and their commercial revenue will be hit by the loss of Messi.
And they still have €1.35bn debt (per Laporta) so even if they make a profit, that’s going to hang around their necks for years. I think that debt figure is a net amount, so even worse than it sounds.
A bail-out by the City assumes the City has the money (unlikely, post covid) and could get around state aid rules (questionable). The scale of the problem feels too big to be solved by public goodwill.
That is brilliantEvery time I feel a bit down I rewatch this video which instantly gives me laughs...thanks Barca 🙂
Every time I feel a bit down I rewatch this video which instantly gives me laughs...thanks Barca 🙂
Wasn’t it for 200m?Real’s “bail-out” (the sale of their training ground) was for €23m. That probably got around state aid as there was some wiggle room in the valuation, even though everyone smelt a rat.
Barca are €1.35bn in debt. That’s nearly 60 times as much. They don’t have anything they can sell that’s worth that much and it won’t beat the state aid regs.
Plus central government isn’t going to be keen on doing Catalonia a favour.
Not happening.
Every time I feel a bit down I rewatch this video which instantly gives me laughs...thanks Barca 🙂
The total value of the deal was more like €440m apparently (per UEFA), but the government proportion was valued at €27m (settled in two instalments, one of which was adjusted to €22.7m as it was settled several years later (complicated series of land swaps)). So they actually got €13.5m + €22.7m = €36.2m from the government - apologies but I missed the first €13.5m. The rest of the proceeds was private money (property developers).Wasn’t it for 200m?
Thanks that’s great information.The total value of the deal was more like €440m apparently (per UEFA), but the government proportion was valued at €27m (settled in two instalments, one of which was adjusted to €22.7m as it was settled several years later (complicated series of land swaps)). So they actually got €13.5m + €22.7m = €36.2m from the government - apologies but I missed the first €13.5m. The rest of the proceeds was private money (property developers).
There appears to have been reporting at the time that the full sale was to the council, but this was incorrect.
The EU investigated state aid breaches on the Council proportion, ruling against Madrid, but that was later over-turned on appeal.
Watched both their games, I’d genuinely be surprised if they made it out that group now.Barca in the champions league this season.
2 games
0 shots on target
Pedri is expected to sign a new contract tomorrow.
Looks suspiciously like a financial trick dreamt up by an imbecile to convince their creditors that they have assets to match their debts.[article]Teenage midfielder Pedri has agreed a contract extension with Barcelona which includes a 1bn euro (£846m) release clause, the club has announced.
[/article] From the beeb.
I’m sure people the same when Neymers release clause was set at 200m odd.Looks suspiciously like a financial trick dreamt up by an imbecile to convince their creditors that they have assets to match their debts.
Won't make any difference when they go bust and he gets released on a free. 😉[article]Teenage midfielder Pedri has agreed a contract extension with Barcelona which includes a 1bn euro (£846m) release clause, the club has announced.
[/article] From the beeb.
Barca have published their detailed 2021 accounts. at 30 June 2021 they owed a total of €231m in transfer fees. Of this, €212m (nearly 92%) is due to financial institutions (or as they put it, has been sold to financial institutions by the selling clubs). They still owe €42.6m for Coutinho (three and a half years after they signed him), so you can look forward to lots of ill-informed stories about that in the press in the next few days.
I will reiterate my previous opinion that all of this selling of the transfer debt by the selling clubs was part of a scheme by Barca to give themselves more time to pay and to disguise the fact that they actually owe more to financing banks than they are letting on.
Barca have published their detailed 2021 accounts. at 30 June 2021 they owed a total of €231m in transfer fees. Of this, €212m (nearly 92%) is due to financial institutions (or as they put it, has been sold to financial institutions by the selling clubs). They still owe €42.6m for Coutinho (three and a half years after they signed him), so you can look forward to lots of ill-informed stories about that in the press in the next few days.
I will reiterate my previous opinion that all of this selling of the transfer debt by the selling clubs was part of a scheme by Barca to give themselves more time to pay and to disguise the fact that they actually owe more to financing banks than they are letting on.
Bissouma is in prison unfortunately
Is this you trying to break him out? 🙂