Im confused by this press angle regarding why Suarez is being given penalties.
The suggestion seems to be that he sometimes dives.
Ok. So sometimes he should get booked right?
If he dives 9 times out of 10 he should be booked 9 times right?
The tenth time is a penalty.
It shouldnt matter how many times he has dived. If its a pen its a pen.
The referees job is to apply the rules, not in any way to assume he knows what has happened.
I really am struggling to understand the suggestion that if he wasnt a diver the ref WOULD have given a pen!!!?
Thats extraordinary isnt it!? The suggestion being that referees arent applying the rules impartially based on what happens in front of them.
I didnt see the aftermatch press junkets but I really hope Mr Rodgers went apeshit over that penalty decision and that lad Barnetts two footer.
The suggestion seems to be that he sometimes dives.
Ok. So sometimes he should get booked right?
If he dives 9 times out of 10 he should be booked 9 times right?
The tenth time is a penalty.
It shouldnt matter how many times he has dived. If its a pen its a pen.
The referees job is to apply the rules, not in any way to assume he knows what has happened.
I really am struggling to understand the suggestion that if he wasnt a diver the ref WOULD have given a pen!!!?
Thats extraordinary isnt it!? The suggestion being that referees arent applying the rules impartially based on what happens in front of them.
I didnt see the aftermatch press junkets but I really hope Mr Rodgers went apeshit over that penalty decision and that lad Barnetts two footer.