I really don't think people should be getting excited for isak
Newcastle will sell either Gordon or Isak imho.
I really don't think people should be getting excited for isak
PSR issues though innit.
It's not that they'd have to sell Isak to fund Elitike but that they wouldn't be buying him in the first place if Isak was staying.
It's odd - £80m on a backup striker? Hard to believe if you ask me.
He's not a backup though. He's an understudy and the heir when Isak leaves in 18 months time
He's not a backup though. He's an understudy and the heir when Isak leaves in 18 months time
Probably, but I genuinely don't think we should be expecting it.Newcastle will sell either Gordon or Isak imho.
Probably, but I genuinely don't think we should be expecting it.
View: https://x.com/SkySportsNews/status/1945007512408780901
As others have said it might be Newcastle planning on selling Isak next summer. The question then is what do we do now.
I wouldnt be concerned about us not being linked to certain players. Thats how we operate under Edwards and Hughes. Its been said several times that we have scouted Sesko extensively.
Isak and Fofana and its not even closeWhat would be the best transfer scenario for us:
Sesko and Gordon
Isak and Fofana
Isak and RodrygoWhat would be the best transfer scenario for us:
Sesko and Gordon
Isak and Fofana
I would be very surprised if we buy Isak and why is everyone assuming Newcastle don't want to keep Isak and buy Ekitike?
People are assuming they are close to PSR breaching. Forgetting that they are in the CL again.
Ekitike will be the Wilson replacement.
I can't imagine him moving there to play second fiddle to Isak.It’s entirely plausible, but equally, they’ve let Callum Wilson go and with CL and Isak missing the odd game with injury, it’s equally plausible that they want, or more likely need, a 2nd forward.
They learnt a lesson last time they were in the CL- so I’d imagine they’ll want to consolidate and make sure they’re in again next year.
It's not that they'd have to sell Isak to fund Elitike but that they wouldn't be buying him in the first place if Isak was staying.
It's odd - £80m on a backup striker? Hard to believe if you ask me.
Yup he has 2 years on his contract and Palace will ask for a very high price, specially given Guehi contract situation & what we are willing to pay for him.His cost wouldn't be backup money, that's the thing
You're assuming they will play 433 with 1 number 9.They will need to make a decent sale after signing Ekitike. Their local journos aluded to the same.
Ekitike wouldn’t move to Newcastle to be a back up.
I can't imagine him moving there to play second fiddle to Isak.