• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Mo Salah 2025/26 Season

Yeah but you're part of the Mo Salah superfan club, just like you were Trent, so of course you'll be 1 that turns a blind eye whenever he fucks up. Poor Mo Salah never gets the ball down his side, get the fuck outta here man.

Salah doesn't have the legs anymore to be productive for a full 90, that's been evident for over 2 years. Sit his arse on the bench for a bit and either sign a new winger that has some self confidence to beat a man and the balls to work, or play Szobo/Harvey/Rio/Frimpong.
And you were part of the original Mo hate club previous year who had a massive forced climb down last year. But regardless, let’s focus…
You don’t have a fcking clue dude, all over the place. If we went with your suggestions, we would be bottom half. Trent and Mo, part of the golden gen who achieved the lot, how awful of me to get behind them,,,
Rio/Harvey/Szbo/Frimpong to start over Mo? Rio is 16 and plays left it seems, Frimpong who is injured? Sign someone else? It’s not going to happen as we have other bigger priorities. Come up with at least a plausible plan? That was pure nonsense.
You bang on about Mo, because it’s easy but unluckily for you, he is doing his job still.
 
We would have gotten only 2 points if Salah was not on the pitch. The deft cross to Jones which ended up in the sky and then Chiesa. The pass to Rio.

He is not playing too well now, but he is still the difference maker most of the time. In the 2nd half of last season it was the same; despite not playing well, he has layed on so many great balls to our players that were not finished off.

Are posters here actually allergic to players who actually have an end product? Gakpo was picked on alot, now Salah.

Who else has been producing the goods consistently I wonder? Who else should start ahead of Salah and Gakpo?
 
We would have gotten only 2 points if Salah was not on the pitch. The deft cross to Jones which ended up in the sky and then Chiesa. The pass to Rio.
That makes the assumption that with 11 men defending and attacking we wouldn't have gone on to score more and that we would have still conceded twice despite having the extra man actually in our half of the pitch.
 
That makes the assumption that with 11 men defending and attacking we wouldn't have gone on to score more and that we would have still conceded twice despite having the extra man actually in our half of the pitch.
What on earth are you on about?
 
I have tried.

When someone is over complicating things, it just tells me he is clutching at straws.
It's not complicated so that may say something about you. Take Salah away when he's not contributing and replace him with someone who defends as well as attacks.
 
It's not complicated so that may say something about you. Take Salah away when he's not contributing and replace him with someone who defends as well as attacks.
Let's drop Salah against Arsenal because of some crazy theory then!
 
Let's drop Salah against Arsenal because of some crazy theory then!
How on earth is it a ‘crazy theory’ that someone can contribute in both an attacking sense and a defensive sense on the right?

If Szobo started on the right instead of Mo the other night for instance, we’d have been infinitely more defensively solid and he’d still have been able to potentially contribute in the attacking third…when moved into midfield for instance he was integral to our winning goal…

Our team is unbalanced right now and unless Salah makes use of the considerable efforts of others to make up for his lack of defensive duty by being a unicorn attacker, we’re skewing the whole system without reward.
 
Back
Top Bottom