[quote author=Rosco link=topic=42898.msg1360678#msg1360678 date=1309963403]
[quote author=mark1975 link=topic=42898.msg1360673#msg1360673 date=1309963117]
[quote author=Rosco link=topic=42898.msg1360662#msg1360662 date=1309962579]
[quote author=mark1975 link=topic=42898.msg1360652#msg1360652 date=1309962260]
Well we went for him in January, so it's hardly as simple as that. At least we haven't just pissed about for weeks to overpay, which is what a few people suggested was happening.
[/quote]
but you've used the "were doung business behind closed doors" line to have a go at people for getting a bit worried over the players we're being linked with.
And now we're signing those players people werent impressed with
[/quote]
I said people don't know what's going on and we should show some patience. You'd have had to have been living on Mars to not know we were in for Charlie Adam, there's a bit of a difference. And anyway, it's hardly some sort of majority opinion that people don't want him, or rather, "aren't impressed", so who gives a shit?
[/quote]
two extremes there Mark, you cant say we know nothing while acknowledging everyone knew Adam was a target.
[/quote]
What? It's two completely different scenario's. He's a player we tried to buy six months ago, should we have done a Men In Black on everyone?
It's a bit pointless arguing the toss because it's pretty obvious to everyone it's a different situation.