Apparently the money was signed with two hours to go. The deal was agreed, the president just refused to sign the player over.
Konoplyanka (a tiny bit NSFW, sorry)
- Thread starter Ryan
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Status
Apparently the money was signed with two hours to go. The deal was agreed, the president just refused to sign the player over.
Actually that is just one rumour / version. Who from the club has said it was ready with '2 hours to go' ? Have I missed something ? Do you have quotes ?
If you want evidence of what really happened you could always Google round the internet yourself but Konoplyanka has said that the "Dnipro president had the last word"
I see. You are taking rumours and newspaper articles without quotes as fact of what LFC actually did. I understand now.
No, I said "apparently" as no one knows the facts. Exactly, the same approach as you did. Do carry on acting like an arse though.
You did indeed. Apologies. Not the same as my approach though because my comment was based on the lack of evidence, not apparent evidence !
The recent reported comments from Konoplyanka just make me think it was the Dnipro president that pulled the plug that's all. It's all fruitless debate anyway. We didn't strengthen the team. Again. That's all that matters which is a bloody shame given where we're sitting in the table
I'm pretty sure if I was conducting a multi-million pound deal with someone in the Ukraine, I'd want everything signed before I transferred any money.
Doesn't money , when involved in big deals, sometimes get place in some form of holding account ?
Really??
I would never authorise payment on any business contract until the t's & c's have been agreed and signed. I don't think I've ever even seen a contract that stipulated payment prior to signing.
Escrow accounts are all well and good when there are multiple parties involved or there is an extended period of time during which the terms of the contract can be satisfied or investigated. So far as I'm aware this was just two parties so the transaction should be quite simple: conditions met, payment made.
The players contract is a separate transaction.
He refused to sign the Transfer. This doesn't mean the Contract wasn't signed.
You can agree in the contract that the transfer will only be executed if the money is received by a certain date. You can either hold the money in escrow, or sign the transfer and hold the document in escrow. Either way, if the money doesn't come in the deal is off.
And yes, it was wise of them to do it and I think it happens quite often.
Otherwise they might be stuck chasing us for payment and be Kono-less. I think we were in that situation with Roma for the John Arne Riise transfer.
You can agree in the contract that the transfer will only be executed if the money is received by a certain date. You can either hold the money in escrow, or sign the transfer and hold the document in escrow. Either way, if the money doesn't come in the deal is off.
And yes, it was wise of them to do it and I think it happens quite often.
Otherwise they might be stuck chasing us for payment and be Kono-less. I think we were in that situation with Roma for the John Arne Riise transfer.
For the love of god. Lock the thread.
I'm curious - what is it about a thread that stimulates the need in others to demand the thread be locked?
Is there a fear thing? Do they have a phobia about lengthy threads or multiple pages? Is it a superstition - a player will never sign for us while a different transfer thread remains open?
What is it - other than some unresolved childhood issues?
Sent from my HTC One XL
Is there a fear thing? Do they have a phobia about lengthy threads or multiple pages? Is it a superstition - a player will never sign for us while a different transfer thread remains open?
What is it - other than some unresolved childhood issues?
Sent from my HTC One XL
Yeah you're right Wiz.
After 37 pages of speculation, a continuation of that discussion is exactly what this forum needs.
If I really have to explain to you why locking a 37 page thread about a dead topic can be a useful and proactive thing to do to encourage constructive discussion then I suggest you go talk to your mother about your childhood issues.
After I've finished banging her.
Do it.
If only you could demonstrate some semblance of cognitive ability rather than relying on mindless clichés and desperate grasping of superstition I might point out the oxy-moronic aspects of a "dead topic which continues to stimulate discussion". Besides, as I hear it, you and your in-bred family need to spend more time on your penile dysfunction rather than being hopelessly overmatched on an internet forum.
I honestly have no idea what you're blathering on about.
The only thing you're over-matching me at is talking utter shite and totally misquoting me.
Oh that and showing everyone what a total fucking cunt you are.
Well done.
Haha! I can't believe I fell for it! I'm actually keeping this going! Hurray for Wizardry!
- Status
