Course there is, but like Nunez himself, it doesn’t mean the joke landed or hit its intended target.
Darwin - the evolution of a transfer
- Thread starter Hansern
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
Momo was right.
It's not market or a scenario where we can be stubborn over his price until the end of the window. The club need to keep Napolli engaged. We're not spoilt for choice of suitors and we need two nines to come in, or at least a nine and an adaptable attacker. Having the time to get that done and then integrated during pre season is every bit as important as the fee.
I think they were but on their terms
Italian clubs innit. I had hopes but absolutely no expectations about this.
Maybe they could focus on making a bloody offer then…
I've known one or two cases of clubs trying and failing to sell players who have then had another opportunity and grabbed it with both hands.
Only in Xpert Eleven though.
Only in Xpert Eleven though.
Hendo?
Exactly, so never serious. They'll come in and go 20m with 20m in add-ons and then be surprised when we go no.
It's the same for all Italian clubs. Never buy Italians and never sell to Italians.
Yes to an extent, but Brodgers and his regime were already losing credibility by that time.
It is extremely optimistic, but am leaning this way. His has proven to be an occasional game winner. It is strange that it never seems to build confidence and let him go on a streak, but is constant running could open up space for Wirtz late in games.
Only if we can actually find two strikers, including one at less cost that Darwin. I do not feel strongly about this, but I am leaning slightly this way. If we got one good striker in, I would be satisfied.
Wirtz can feed him all he likes, he doesn't know the offside law and he can't hit a barn door.
Agreed. I would not even consider it without the tragic loss.
It would be an option if we can't unload him for a reasonable fee (and by that I think the club are looking at £45m ball park).
Everyone here hates him / ridicules him for his insane misses but at the same time his record isn't horrendous and his record in Portugal was damn good with most (about 60% I think I posted years ago) of his goals coming from within 6-7m where he had little time to think. He did get into those goalscoring positions close in.
When we had Robbo and Trent bombing in umpteen dangerous crosses a match into the box - that was perfect. Unfortunately Klopp then decided to invert Trent and Robbo lost his touch and so our width died and Nunez wasn't the player for our new tactics.
Maybe with Wirtz, Kerkez and Frimpong / Bradley he could be - at least as a backup - I'd not put money on him (or us winning the PL) should he start however if we are struggling it might be a tactical option.
Nope.
Similar threads
-
- Locked
