[quote author=Rosco link=topic=44931.msg1315622#msg1315622 date=1302794204]
The other aspect of it is not everyone can be the star of the show, those stars need a supporting cast who aren't going try to overplay their position by attempting to make their own chances rather than chances for our big money stars.
We're clearly not going to be asking Downing to lead the team, were going to ask him to get down the wing and stick decent crosses in for Carroll. By all accounts that's a job he's capable of doing.
Whereas signing Hazard adds a potentially better player to the mix I don't think he'll have as much of a benefit for Carroll
[/quote]
For me signing Downing would be disappointing. I see some of the same people who said give Roy a chance last year say "he'll be steady hands", or "you can't have all great players", or "don't judge him yet", or you "need a supporting cast". or "he'll be a squaddy" - well first let's sign some high quality talent and then I'll jump for joy when Downing is linked as back-up.
Of course we can't afford 11-15 world beaters in every position, and we need grafters and the less talented reliables, but Downing would be a terrible statement of intent, at this point unless we're going to also sign another high caliber winger or flair player. By statement of intent, I mean we're signing more plodders - to continue as before.
And if you want a supporting cast Rosco, is it not better to bring through some of the talented youth for that role? Don't we supposedly have a great crop of players on the way?
Why sign the Downings of the world? blood more young lads, and at least you could sell on a young player who didn't make the grade to a Blackburn or a Wigan. With a Downing, you'd be stuck with high wages and a difficult sale.