West Brom (a) - match thread
- Thread starter hamstrung_pigeon
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Status
His link up play in the box was really good, but in the build up play he was poor. As was Coutinho, fucking wasteful.
I thought in the box he was shit as well. He rarely found a man.
Coutinho at least looked like he gave a fuck with a couple of runs
Exasperating. We don't have any forwards who'll tower over defenders to head the ball, nor do we have ones who'll chest it down for a volley, so why do we keep hoisting crosses into the box? Against this sort of team you need to keep passing, keep moving, and be patient. It's as if they all see the ghost of Andy Carroll.
Lambert?
It must be from Rodgers that Ibe and sterling barely cut inside
It's almost like Rodgers is specifically showing the owners that our strikers are shit, whilst doing the bare minimum to try and get the ones we do have to integrate with the team.
Borini and balotelli are not players for the spearhead. Play them together to create space, or have Ibe/sterling /marko cut in a lot to make space.
This is death by football
To be fair I thought Dawson played well against Sterling. Ibe was not match fit, he slowed the game down by taking that extra touch.
We gave dawson the chance to play well by playing the ball to their feet. How about playing it ahead of them so that they could race on to the ball? I am sure they could have done more like this.
I can't think of one positive from this season
At least you heeded my advice.Not really Jimmy took a few more wickets 285-8! 90mins well spent
Change of manager?
Ibe.
I should have done the same and I have no idea what you are talking about.Not really Jimmy took a few more wickets 285-8! 90mins well spent
I don't get the "didn't look like they gave a fuck" comments, I thought we dominated throughout. They put 9 men behind the ball everytime. I'm loathed to dress up these kinds of performances, but I don't think it was one to be given the "half arsed" tag. We suffered with what we have all season, a lack of a killer touch infront of goal. There was NO ONE taking up striker positions when we got in behind, had a striker been there (other than Mario, who is either offside or too far away from the danger zone), it would have been a different story.
That's what I thought
We dominated possession, that's it.
We did nothing creative in the final 3rd because no one looked arsed. From striker all the way back. We looked clueless near the box
In a must win game to give us any chance whatsoever of getting Champions League and we don't even score a goal. No doubt Brendan will claim that Qualifying for the Europa league (if we even manage that) is an achievement that no other manager could have done.
Not really Jimmy took a few more wickets 285-8! 90mins well spent
Wow !
*reopens BBC Test Match app which was closed after Braithwaites century*
Boycott : "You'd expect tail-enders to think a little bit better than that - more brains in a chocolate mouse."
I think your misinterpreting the lack of a striker for a lack of effort.
- Status
Similar threads
-
- Locked
