This is the absolute problem with this sort of thing with Dreamie.
It starts with the “he’s a big gamble… blah blah blah”
He’s now got the opening he needed to do the “Dreamie Double Down” and started “I never say I was right, but I’m saying I was right!!!”.
It’s, important at this point he maintains the pretence that this is some sort of debate in which he could be swayed - he can’t, that’s not what this is about.
The thing he will never do, is set out criteria by which his argument can be proven to be wrong.
These two things allow him to simultaneously dismiss any criticism and double down on his own position.
If Wirtz plays well in the next 5 games, producing good numbers he’ll double down to “it’s only 5 games, needs to be over a season”, in absolute contradiction to his starting position of deeming Wirtz not good enough after less than 5 games.
If Wirtz plays well for the rest of the season, then he’ll pivot to somehow expecting more because of the cost - even if he puts out prime Mo figures, he’ll have cost more so therefore Dreamie was still right because it was such an expensive signing.
Even if he’s our player of the season, the Dreamie pivot will be, for the cost he needs to do it over numerous years…. just like Mo!!!
He’ll flip-flop around goals, assists, position and who it’s comparable with, changing to suit whatever allows his to say “I was right”.
I mean even if Wirtz posted figure better than prime Messi, Dreamie will pivot to “Messi didn’t cost as much as Wirtz”.
He’ll likely pivot into the nebulous area where it’s “eye test” or whatever… you know the “yeah he score 40 goals and makes 60 assists a season…. But for that money I’d expect him to dominate the opposition more, dictate tempo and have more other-worldly passing!!!”.
All that’s fine and Dreamie is entitled to do whatever he wants to do to get his kicks - the trap, which we all fall into, myself many a time, is actually thinking it’s a debate whereby Dreamie is there to be proven wrong or to engage in any meaningful way other than “I was right”.
Of course - Dreamie could prove me wrong by specifying the criteria by which he would change his mind and deem Wirtz a success - it would save us all a lot of time and effort trying to offer suggestions or points, which he can just bat away like like a stonewalling opening batsman setting his stall, not to score, but to not get out.., our Arteta tactics when playing anyone half decent, or Peps new tactics when playing anyone!!!!
Come on
@Dreambeliever - what’s your criteria for success - how many goals and assists does he need to achieve - what actually constitutes a success whereby your “I hope he succeeds” can be substantiated?